Micah Ministries

Previously in " Can Non-Resistant Non-Belief be Compatible with Atheism " I write " as defined in the Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (SEoP) as "(A)n atheist is a person who maintains that there is no God, that is, that the sentence “God exists” expresses a false proposition." If you are a lack-theist, you are simply confused; the claim of atheism is the negation of the theistic claim! If you want to state your psychological state, that is, you lack belief in God (you don't possess the proposition God exists), that isn't a positive claim and frankly removes you from the debate. Your brain state, like a weather pattern, isn't a debatable position and doesn't demonstrate a rationally held position, it's just how your brain happens to be at this point. By this logic, a stone lacks belief in the proposition God exists. In principle this can't be a legitimate position of a NRNB, as that too is a brain state, not a rational position, in ...

Introduction In my previous posts " Did Jesus Really Suffer? " Arguing the Jesus’s sacrifice was more than 3 days of inconvenience and a infinite lowering of His power to reconcile man to God. And in " Can Finite Crimes Deserve Infinite Punishment? " Showing hell is firstly a place outside God's presence and secondly,  it's the logical consequence of the ultimate rejection of God's provision; God can not force you into His presence against your will. In this post I will try to tackle why Jesus’s death is sufficient to save humanity. The legal framework: In law, in particular employment law, a manager('s) or a managing director can be legally liable for mistakes employees made in certain extreme cases, even if the manager('s) or managing director had no knowledge or direct involvement in the negligent acts perpetrated by the employee. The very fact they were in charge and responsible at the time can be enough to condemn them to prison and or fi...